Literature Review Archives - Prof David Stuckler

Options for Getting Help With a Literature Review (Compared)

Many PhD students and early-career researchers struggle with literature reviews not because they lack ability, but because the process is rarely taught in a structured way. When researchers get stuck, they typically turn to a mix of tools, institutional support, and informal advice, each with different strengths and limitations. This guide compares the main ways researchers get help with literature reviews and explains when each approach makes sense.

Options for Getting Help With a Literature Review (Compared) Read More »

Why “describing papers” kills literature reviews

Many literature reviews fail because students describe papers instead of using evidence. This guide explains the difference between description and synthesis — and how the DID + FOUND rule turns studies into arguments.

Why “describing papers” kills literature reviews Read More »

What a “conceptual framework” really is (and what it isn’t)

A conceptual framework is not a diagram you invent at the start of a literature review. This guide explains how structure emerges from evidence, and why frameworks often become clear only after systematic analysis.

What a “conceptual framework” really is (and what it isn’t) Read More »

Why most literature reviews fail before writing begins – ‘mise en place’

Most literature reviews fail not because of poor writing, but because writing begins before analysis is complete. This guide explains why premature drafting creates confusion, endless rewrites, and stalled progress. It also set outs what must come first.

Why most literature reviews fail before writing begins – ‘mise en place’ Read More »

Why literature review must start broader than your study

A literature review must start one level broader than the researcher’s specific study in order to make the research gap meaningful.

A common mistake is to begin a literature review at the exact level of the intended study.

When this happens, students conclude there is “no literature”, not because a gap exists, but because the review started too narrow.

Why literature review must start broader than your study Read More »

#1 Literature Review Mistake: the funnel concept

A literature review is not a mere summary of articles. It is a structured argument that narrows toward a research gap. Its purpose is to justify the reason for your study’s (or dissertation’s) existence.

#1 Literature Review Mistake: the funnel concept Read More »